It Took 17 Years, Three
Bankruptcies, And A Half-Dozen Lawsuits But Now Here Comes Spider-Man
One of this summer's hottest films is
likely to be Spider-Man, the $139 million extravaganza from Sony's
Columbia Pictures scheduled for release on May 3. Spider-Man is
the superhero who used to swing from the pages of Marvel Comics,
catching bad guys with spider webs that sprang from his wrists.
The big-screen version is getting heavy buzz and will get the customarily
heavy summer season off to an early start, two weeks before it has
to do battle with George Lucas' much-awaited Star Wars: Episode
2 -- Attack of the Clones.
Even Spidey, brilliantly characterized
in the comics by writer Stan Lee, could never have spun a web as
tangled as the one that ensnared him on his way to the multiplex.
It took 17 years, three bankruptcies, and a half-dozen lawsuits
-- involving, it seems, half of Hollywood -- before Sony was able
to give it the green light. Finally, after filming was completed,
the web-slinger's leap to the screen was delayed seven months so
more special effects could be added.
SONY'S SUMMER? That the film
was made at all speaks volumes about Hollywood's search for the
Holy Grail: franchises that can be spun into gold in the guise of
video games, fast-food tie-ins, and endless streams of sequels.
And it says a lot about Sony Pictures, which has seen big-budget
go big-bust for most of the 13 years since the Japanese electronics
giant came to Hollywood. ``This company,'' says Sony Chairman John
Calley, ``has always suffered from not being able to market a franchise
film.''
Ironically, the much-delayed film will
be showing up from Sony just a few weeks before another oft-delayed
project hits the screens, the sequel to Sony's 1997 Men in Black.
Factor in the sequel to its 1999 Stuart Little, about an adorable
adopted mouse, and Sony may have its first blockbuster summer in
many years.
It's a good bet no one at Columbia Pictures
ever thought the company would be looking to launch its summer with
a second-tier comic-book character. Spider-Man, launched in 1965,
is the story of high-schooler, Peter Parker, who acquires his powers
after being bitten by a radioactive spider. When the rights to the
comic-book character first came up for bid in 1985, it wasn't a
good time for superheroes. Spider-Man was simply another of the
properties then-bankrupt Marvel Comics was hoping to sell, and the
mild-mannered showing for Warner Bros.' fourth Superman flick convinced
Hollywood that superheroes didn't have much of a big-screen future.
GOING FOR BROKE. The only producer
willing to take a shot at bringing Spider-Man to the screen was
Israeli gadfly Menahem Golan, whose independent film studio Cannon
Films bid a paltry $225,000 for the rights. Golan spent an additional
$2 million on 10 different scripts but could never get anyone to
back the film.
Faced with severe financial woes, Cannon
within a couple of years was taken over by Italian financier Giancarlo
Parretti's Pathe Communications, which eventually also bought the
fabled MGM studio. Parretti himself then went bankrupt. As part
of Golan's separation deal from Pathe, he took Spider-Man and in
1988 started another company, 21st Century Films. But he still couldn't
get the financing.
Golan ended up selling TV rights for
the film to Viacom and the home-video rights to Columbia. Theatrical
rights went to Carolco, another one-time independent studio highflier,
for $5 million. Carolco, famed for its ability to make big-budget
flicks like Rambo II and Terminator, signed on the latter film's
director, James Cameron, to write the script. Once budgeted at a
modest $15 million, Spider-Man became a $50 million project.
SUPERHERO SUITS. Then the legal
fisticuffs began. In 1993, Golan felt he was being shoved out of
the picture and sued to overturn his deal with Carolco. Before long,
everyone was suing everyone else. Carolco sued Viacom and Columbia
in separate suits to reunite the TV and video rights. Columbia and
Viacom countersued Carolco. Even MGM sued -- naming Golan, Viacom,
and even Marvel Comics -- alleging fraud in the original deal with
Cannon. Within a year, Carolco, 21st Century, and Marvel had each
filed for bankruptcy.
In 1998, Marvel emerged from bankruptcy
and, more important, the courts determined that the rights it sold
to Golan in 1985 had expired. Marvel then settled with both MGM
and Viacom and, in 1999, sold the rights to Sony for a reported
$7 million. Sony and Marvel formed a joint venture to handle the
merchandising.
Of course, the problems weren't over.
The script went through a dozen rewrites [an ongoing lawsuit by
some of the screenwriters claims they were improperly stripped of
credits on the final product] and a casting merry-go-round. Sony
wanted Leonardo DiCaprio to play the superhero, then Freddie Prinze
Jr., before finally settling on fresh-faced, 26-year-old Tobey Maguire.
Kristin Dunst stars as love interest Mary Jane Watson. To direct,
Sony turned to sometime-actor Sam Raimi, who headed the bust superhero
film Darkman in 1990, a couple of small-budget movies, and The Gift,
starring Hillary Swank and Cate Blanchett two years back.
TO THE RESCUE? Spider-Man's filming
finished last June, but the release, expected for Christmas, was
bumped to May because additional special effects were needed. Even
the advertising campaign hit a snag: The initial trailer, featuring
the World Trade Center, had to be redone in the wake of September
11.
Now, with the darn thing done, it looks
like Sony can breathe easy. Big-league composer Danny Elfman did
the score. Promotional partners include Kentucky Fried Chicken and
Hardee's restaurants, Dr. Pepper, and Kellogg's. You can catch Spider-Man
images on Sony's new cell phones and on the covers of some of its
Walkmans. Then, of course, are the tons of products, from Topps
trading cards to Hasbro action figures. Ads are already blitzing
the airwaves, and there are magazine covers by the dozens. At last,
it looks like Sony has its franchise in the making.
An optimistic Sony is already gearing
up for a second installment, due out for next summer. A sequel after
a year? Not bad for a movie that took 17 years to get to the big
screen. Ronald Grover
|